13 Nov 2025
Rules notifiedThe DPDP Rules, 2025 were published; designated initial provisions began to operate.
From uncertainty to documented readiness.
Assess, implement and review your obligations under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the DPDP Rules, 2025—with clear scopes, accountable owners and usable processes.
Implementation is being phased in. Use the time before the main deadlines to map processes, assign owners and test operational safeguards.
The DPDP Rules, 2025 were published; designated initial provisions began to operate.
Registration and related Consent Manager obligations are scheduled to apply.
Most notice, consent, security, breach, erasure and Data Principal rights duties are scheduled to apply.
If your organisation processes digital personal data involving people in India, the law may apply—even when the business operates internationally. Customers, staff, patients, students and leads all create real operational considerations.
DPDP readiness involves clear notices, valid consent where required, meaningful withdrawal, security safeguards, Data Principal rights handling, breach response and purpose-linked erasure.
We help translate those obligations into concrete workflows, records and responsibilities that your teams can actually maintain.
Start with your real data flows. Identify what matters, what is missing and which fixes reduce the greatest risk.
Discuss a gap assessmentUnder the Act's penalty schedule, failure to take reasonable security safeguards can attract a penalty of up to ₹250 crore, assessed by the Board.
Core operating duties are scheduled for May 2027. Implementation, process changes and contracts benefit from early planning.
Grievance resolution, detailed breach reporting (including the prescribed 72-hour timeframe) and some 48-hour pre-erasure notices require planned processes, where applicable.
Start with an assessment, move through implementation and review your controls with an audit. Each engagement has a defined scope and documented deliverables.
Privacy advisory that turns the DPDP Act and Rules into decisions for your product, legal, IT and business teams. From notice design and purpose limitation to processor agreements and governance.
Leadership teams seeking a long-term compliance partner.
A structured review of how you collect, use, share, store and delete personal data, mapped to applicable DPDP obligations. Receive a risk-ranked gap register and a remediation roadmap.
Businesses beginning their DPDP journey or unsure what is missing.
Evidence-based testing of consent records, notices, rights-request logs, security safeguards, breach procedures, vendor contracts and retention practices.
Organisations with controls in place that need independent verification.
Hands-on execution: data mapping, notices and consent flows, rights workflows, incident response, retention schedules, vendor clauses and operational handover.
Teams ready to close gaps with accountable owners and usable controls.
Programme coordination, grievance handling and Board liaison support. An India-based DPO is mandatory for Significant Data Fiduciaries; other Data Fiduciaries still need a published contact person.
Let's discussTailored privacy notices, consent text, internal policies, processor contracts, retention schedules, breach playbooks and evidence records—not generic copied templates.
Let's discussA gap assessment and a compliance audit answer different questions. Here is how to decide.
| Decision point | DPDP gap assessment | DPDP compliance audit |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose | Your controls are informal or not yet in place | Controls exist and you want evidence they work |
| Core question | What is missing under the Act and Rules? | Do our controls work as designed? |
| Method | Interviews, walkthroughs and document review | Sample-testing records, logs, contracts and workflows |
| Deliverable | Gap register and prioritised remediation roadmap | Audit report with evidence and corrective actions |
| Next step | Implementation | Remediation and re-testing |
A structured five-stage engagement, with something tangible handed over at every stage. Timing is scoped to your systems and readiness.
Confirm applicability and your role as Data Fiduciary, Data Processor or both; review systems and current processes.
Inventory personal data, purposes, systems, vendors, recipients and retention across web, app, CRM, HR and support.
Prioritise and implement notices, consent flows, rights workflows, safeguards, incident response and contracts.
Define how teams will process requests, maintain records, handle incidents and follow retention and erasure rules.
Test the controls periodically, refresh evidence and track MeitY and Board updates.
A working compliance programme needs clear processes, responsible owners and evidence. We help your business define and implement the systems and workflows behind the policy.
Design purpose-specific notices and consent records, including straightforward withdrawal paths and evidence of when consent was given.
Understand what data you hold, why, where it lives, who receives it and how long it should be retained.
Define intake, verification, routing, responses and grievance handling with an auditable history.
Establish ownership, escalation, notification templates and a playbook for time-sensitive breach reporting.
Build retention schedules, purpose-linked erasure triggers and pre-erasure notice processes where applicable.
Review processors, contract clauses, third-party access and the vendor data flows your business remains responsible for.
Need compliance tooling? We can advise on workflow requirements and implementation options. This page is a consultation service; it does not expose a software dashboard, customer login or live compliance management portal.
Final deliverables depend on your scope. A full engagement may include these practical documents, controls and evidence.
Applicability, fiduciary/processor role and potential Significant Data Fiduciary exposure
Personal data categories, purposes, systems, recipients, transfers and retention
Findings mapped to obligations, ranked by risk and effort, with owners and dates
Clear notices, consent wording and an accessible withdrawal mechanism
Request intake, verification, response templates and time tracking
Responsibilities, impact assessment and notification procedures
Purpose-based retention, deletion triggers and relevant notification processes
Processor clauses, contracts and third-party risk assessments
Organised proof of controls and a remediation register for review
The same law creates different questions for healthcare, a D2C brand, a SaaS product or an employer. Our starting point is the data flow and risk profile of your sector.
Customer data, sub-processors, telemetry and processor agreements
Checkout consent, payment and order data, retention and erasure
WhatsApp/SMS opt-ins, CDPs, fulfilment and logistics partners
Lean, phased controls that address the biggest risks first
Practical processes without an in-house privacy function
Patient records, secondary-purpose consent and sensitive data flows
Learners under 18, parental consent and limits on tracking
KYC, credit data, incident scenarios and sector requirements
Employee/candidate data and background-verification vendors
Client data access, delivery teams and processor obligations
Lead records, list provenance, campaign consent and client data
Buyer enquiries, channel partners, visits and post-sale retention
Selected statutory duties that shape a typical DPDP readiness programme. Their applicability depends on the nature of your processing and relevant exemptions.
| Obligation | Legal reference | What we help you establish |
|---|---|---|
| Notice | Section 5 / Rule 3 | Plain-language, itemised notices at the appropriate time |
| Consent & withdrawal | Section 6 | Consent records and an easy way to withdraw consent |
| Reasonable security | Section 8(5) / Rule 6 | Safeguards, access controls and documented reviews |
| Breach intimation | Section 8(6) / Rule 7 | Incident plans and prescribed Board / individual notifications |
| Retention & erasure | Section 8(7) / Rule 8 | Purpose-based deletion and relevant advance notices |
| Data Principal rights | Sections 11–14 / Rule 14 | Rights intake, response and grievance procedures |
| Children's data | Section 9 / Rules 10–12 | Verifiable parent/guardian consent where required |
| Significant Data Fiduciary | Section 10 / Rule 13 | Additional governance, DPO, impact assessments and audits |
These are statutory maximum penalties for selected contraventions, not standard fines. The Board considers relevant statutory factors when determining a penalty.
Discuss your priority risksThe statutory references and dates are provided for general information and should be reviewed with qualified Indian privacy counsel before use for legal decisions.
Privacy programmes succeed when responsibility, technology and processes move together—not when policies live unread in a folder.
Start a conversationAn honest estimate needs to account for your systems, personal data, current controls, and how much implementation support you need.
A gap assessment is often the clearest way to scope a programme and price subsequent work. We provide a tailored proposal rather than a one-size-fits-all fee.
Number of systems and channels handling personal data
Data volume, nature and sensitivity
Whether children's data is involved
Potential Significant Data Fiduciary obligations
Existing controls and privacy maturity
Implementation, advisory and ongoing review scope
They help businesses assess, implement and maintain obligations under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and the DPDP Rules, 2025. Typical work covers data mapping, notices, consent, rights, incident response, vendor controls and auditing.
The Act covers processing of digital personal data in India and certain processing outside India connected to offering goods or services to individuals in India, subject to statutory scope and exemptions. Business size alone does not determine applicability.
The Rules were published in November 2025. Consent Manager provisions are scheduled from November 2026, while most operational Data Fiduciary provisions are scheduled from May 2027.
A gap assessment identifies controls that are missing or incomplete and produces a prioritised roadmap. An audit evaluates controls already operating, checks evidence and identifies corrective actions.
No. Appointment of an India-based Data Protection Officer is required for Significant Data Fiduciaries. Other Data Fiduciaries must still make appropriate contact information available for questions about personal data.
It depends on your current systems, volume and uses of personal data, vendors, risk and existing safeguards. An assessment produces a scope-based plan rather than a generic promise.
No. Software can support workflow and evidence management, but your organisation still needs appropriate notices, decisions, contracts, controls and people accountable for them.
Not necessarily. The DPDP Act has its own requirements and definitions, including different approaches to consent, children's data and reporting. Existing GDPR controls are a useful starting point, not a substitute for a DPDP review.
Depending on the breach, the statutory schedule provides for penalties of up to ₹250 crore for failure to take reasonable security safeguards and up to ₹200 crore for some breach-notification failures. Actual penalties depend on the Board's assessment.
We provide operational compliance advisory and implementation support and can work alongside your qualified legal counsel. This page is general information, not a legal opinion or compliance certification.
Tell us about your current systems, data flows or compliance questions. We’ll help identify a sensible next step—consultation, gap assessment or implementation planning.